The problem in large organizations, and the US federal government is pretty much the world’s largest, is that numerous entities have their own turf and their own advancement in mind, and without special efforts being taken will naturally work in ways that cause conflict and delay. Leaders must carefully work to align these interests and incentives toward organizational objectives, but this can be almost impossible when an organization gets out of control. Adding a new committee or bureaucracy in addition to everything else will rarely be the most effective path forward. Meanwhile, those who may have the answer and want to bring their expertise to the table find themselves discouraged, worn down, ignored, and ultimately punished for their passion to innovate and help. Welcome to organizational innovation fatigue, and welcome to the Gulf Coast disaster.
Several voices have discussed the need for innovation in dealing with the disastrous oil leak in the Gulf Coast. There are so many intriguing opportunities for technology–oil absorbent materials, new chemistries for dispersing or attacking the oil, controlled burnoffs, skimming and oil collection systems, barrier technologies to keep the oil away, materials that coagulate oil, and a host of proposed technical solutions for addressing the root cause and stopping the leak. Many of the proposals should be considered and tried. This is not the time for bureaucracy. This is not the time for the government to be shutting down efforts with its bureaucracy. If the Coast Guard is worried about inadequate fire extinguishers, round up a batch and take them over to the relief effort to help, not hinder the State of Louisiana as it tries to protect itself. But what the Coast Guard did in this case is akin to what happens thousands of times each day in companies and government around the world, contributing to the innovation fatigue that stymies much needed efforts at innovation and progress.
Kudos to Kevin and his team! He certainly has an advantage with his name recognition and extensive networks–without that, he may have been viewed as just another voice in the wind claiming to have something. There are others with technologies and potential solutions. May they also find their way to make a difference. May all the innovation fatigue factors remain far from Kevin Costner and all others seeking to bring something new to help us fix the Gulf Coast disaster.
This is bad especially when Obama is in the process of trying to get offshore drilling approved.
The impact the oil spill has had on the local economy is extensive. I am outraged that Obama not put more pressure on the oil companies to clean up their mess.
What really irks me is that the head of the EPA has now been appointed as the main oil cleanup czar — when he and the EPA have been MAJOR barriers to innovation for oil cleanup, shutting down modified bacteria and other technologies that could have been used to eat the oil and greatly accelerate cleanup. Government bureaucracy has been in the way of innovation for years – and now they are the solution???
Dis-incentive is key here.
I will throw another point out there which probably explains more of what is really happening with the qualified engineers qho can really resolve the problem… When our highest government official uses words such as “finding out who’s A$$ to kick” it puts everyone on the defensive. Engineers, in particular, have lots to lose and nothing to gain in that kind of environment. They know very well that it they are somehow tied to the disaster it could be their (as Obama would say) A$$ in court.
It can’t be any more obvious that the teams working on this disaster are only using off-the-shelf tools and methods. The is no ‘innovating’ going on because the risk of being wrong is too large.
Pingback: Tweets that mention The BP Oil Disaster in the Gulf: Innovation Fatigue in Full Force :: Conquering Innovation Fatigue: Helping Inventors, Entrepreneurs and Leaders Find Innovation Success -- Topsy.com